This case established a groundbreaking framework for assessing the amount of damages awarded to employees who experience injury to their feelings as a result of discriminatory conduct.
The ruling has played a crucial role in ensuring fair and just compensation for victims of discrimination in the workplace.
In 1998, Mrs. Vento, an employee of the West Yorkshire Police, experienced sex discrimination and harassment during her employment. She lodged a complaint and subsequently brought a claim under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (the predecessor to the Equality Act 2010 which now sets out the law on discrimination.
Prior to this each type of discrimination was regulated by its own standalone piece of legislation), seeking compensation for the injury to her feelings caused by the discriminatory treatment.
The central issue before the Court of Appeal was to determine the appropriate amount of compensation to be awarded to Mrs. Vento for the injury to her feelings. This case provided an opportunity for the court to establish guidelines for assessing such damages in discrimination cases.
The Court of Appeal, in its judgment, introduced a three-tiered approach for assessing damages in discrimination cases. This approach, commonly known as the “Vento Guidelines,” provided a structured framework for determining the appropriate compensation amount based on the severity of the discriminatory conduct.
The three bands of Vento* compensation are as follows:
1. Lower Band – For less serious cases of discrimination or isolated incidents, compensation ranging from £1,100 to £11,200 may be appropriate.
2. Middle Band – For cases involving more serious and prolonged discriminatory conduct, compensation ranging from £11,200 to £33,700 may be appropriate.
3. Upper Band – For the most severe cases involving particularly serious or prolonged discriminatory conduct, compensation between £33,700 and £56,200 may be appropriate. However in rare and exceptional cases, awards can exceed this and there will be no fixed upper limit
*The bands were originally set in this judgment at £500 to £5,000 (lower band); £5,000 to £15,000 (middle band); and £15,000 to £25,000 (upper band).
The court emphasized that the awards within these bands should be adjusted according to inflation each year and developments in society’s attitudes towards discrimination over time.
The Vento case marked a significant shift in Employment Law by providing a clear and transparent framework for assessing compensation for injury to feelings in discrimination cases. This ruling ensured that victims of discrimination would receive fair and proportionate compensation that reflected the severity and impact of the discriminatory conduct.
The introduction of the Vento bands provided guidance to employment tribunals, judges, and legal practitioners when determining appropriate compensation amounts. It helped standardise the compensation assessment process, promoting consistency and fairness in the treatment of discrimination claims.
Moreover, the Vento bands played a crucial role in raising awareness about the importance of combating discrimination in the workplace. By recognising the emotional harm caused by discriminatory conduct, the case shed light on the long-lasting and profound impact that such treatment can have on individuals.
The Vento framework continues to be highly influential in Employment Law. It has been referenced and applied in numerous subsequent discrimination cases, shaping the way compensation is assessed and awarded for injury to feelings.
The Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police case represents a significant milestone in employment law, establishing the pioneering Vento bands framework for assessing compensation in discrimination cases.
By providing clear guidelines for determining the appropriate amount of damages for injury to feelings, the case ensures fair and just compensation for victims of discrimination.
This landmark ruling has had a profound impact on the legal landscape, promoting consistency, transparency, and fairness in compensation assessments. It has also played a pivotal role in raising awareness about the emotional harm caused by discriminatory conduct in the workplace.
Decades after the decision, the Vento case remains a crucial reference point for judges, employment tribunals, and legal professionals, reaffirming the commitment to combat discrimination and uphold the rights of employees.
Read our previous article in this series here.
Workplace discrimination – Oakwood Solicitors
Get in touch today for a no-obligation consultation. Choose one of the methods on the right-hand side of this page, or call us on 0113 200 9720 to find out how we can help you with your enquiry.
We would love to hear your comments or feedback
Legal Landmark Case – British Home Stores Ltd v Burchell: An Essential Milestone in Employment Law
Throughout our legal careers, we tend to notice that some cases just stay with us, not just throughout our training but because of their great legal significance to UK law and sometimes the necess…
ViewThe Importance Of Your ET1 Form And Why Legal Advice Is Recommended
Approaching an Employment Tribunal can be daunting. The majority of claimants who are undergoing an employment claim will be doing so for the first time. Before you can make a clai…
ViewEmployment Tribunals Resulting From Incidents at Christmas Parties
With the current Omicron variant of COVID-19 impacting planned Christmas parties all over the country (but possibly not No. 10 Downing Street), it steals my chance to write my usual Grinch-worthy …
ViewKnowledge categories
Why Oakwood?
Here at Oakwood Solicitors, we’re not your average law firm – our team delivers a service which caters to you. From assessing your case through to completion, our staff have not only the knowledge and expertise, but also the compassion and understanding to put you at ease throughout the process.
Get in touch
You are leaving Oakwood Solicitors' website.
Please click here to continue to the Oakwood Property Solicitors' website.
ContinueCookies
This website uses cookies. You can read more information about why we do this, and what they are used for here.